The Search Company and the Phone Software
This note reveals the outcome. Participants should decide the case first, on their own devices, before the discussion.
- Who it was
- Google and Android, 2005
- The question
- Should a web company buy a tiny start-up and enter the phone software business?
- What they chose
- Buy the start-up and develop an open phone operating system to give to handset makers.
- Judgement
- Paid off Strong process
- Session length
- 60 minutes, for 4 to 40 participants
Learning objectives
- Value a small acquisition as an option on an uncertain future.
- Distinguish risk, where odds can be estimated, from uncertainty, where they cannot.
- See how a free, open platform can change the basis of competition.
Session plan
- Read the situation, what is known and unknown, and the voices in the room. No discussion yet.
- Each participant chooses an option on the case page, states a confidence and writes a one-line pre-mortem: if this choice fails, the most likely reason is…
- Debate by option. Ask each group to describe the phone market in five years under its option.
- Reveal the outcome.
- Discuss the option logic: what was the most the company could lose, and what could it gain? Then discuss the major redesign after a rival's touchscreen phone, and what it says about committing early.
- Transfer: participants identify a small, cheap option their organisation could buy on an uncertain market.
The case page records each participant’s choice, confidence and pre-mortem in their own browser, and scores the confidence once the outcome is revealed. Nothing is sent anywhere, so it can be used in any classroom.
Questions before the reveal
- Why would a web company care which software runs on phones?
- What is the danger of depending on phone makers and carriers to carry your services?
- What would giving the software away free do to the companies that sell phone software?
Questions after the reveal
- The price was widely estimated at around $50 million. How does that change the judgement of process?
- The platform had to be redesigned after a rival's touchscreen phone appeared. Was buying early still right?
- Who lost when a free, open phone operating system became the most widely used in the world?
The key facts on one page
- The company bought the start-up in 2005 for a price widely estimated at around $50 million.
- The operating system was redesigned in response to a rival's touchscreen phone.
- It launched on phones in 2008, free and open, and became the most widely used operating system in the world.
Where discussions go wrong
- Treating the success as a prediction that came true. The decision was valuable because it was cheap relative to what it could become, not because the outcome was known.
- Ignoring the redesign, which shows how much of the plan changed after the purchase.
The forces at work
- A cheap option on an uncertain future: The price was small relative to the company's resources and the stakes. Buying kept a strategic option open at low cost, which is exactly when acquiring options is most valuable.
- Uncertainty, not risk: Nobody could forecast how phones would develop. A flexible, inexpensive bet suited the situation far better than a detailed forecast would have.
- Changing the basis of competition: Rather than fight incumbent platforms on their terms, the company would give its software away, so that handset makers could compete with the incumbents. Lock-in would be broken by changing who paid.
- Rivals converging: When a rival's touchscreen phone appeared in 2007, the project's design shifted towards touch. Converging with a rival's form was a pragmatic response to where customers were going.
When the future is uncertain and the price is small, buy the option.
Pairs well with: The idea Risk and Uncertainty and the essay on app stores.
Where this comes from
Sources
- VentureBeat, “Google exec. Android was ‘best deal ever’” (2010). Reports the undisclosed price estimated at $50 million.
- Fred Vogelstein, Dogfight. How Apple and Google Went to War and Started a Revolution (Sarah Crichton Books, 2013).
- Open Handset Alliance announcement (November 2007).
Teaching note by Shrikant Kumar. Free to use in classrooms and workshops with attribution.
Shrikant Kumar. “Teaching note: The Search Company and the Phone Software.” Decide case teaching note, Telos. https://shrikantk.com/decide/the-phone-software/teaching/