Ideas How systems shape choices

Whoever Controls the Gate

When information, goods or people must pass through a channel controlled by a few, the choices of those gatekeepers shape what everyone else sees, buys and becomes, and their power grows with the narrowness of the gate.

The idea in plain words

Most of what reaches us passes through a gate. Food reaches the family table through whoever does the shopping. News reaches readers through editors. Software reaches phones through app stores, and websites reach readers through search engines. Whoever controls the gate decides what passes, in what order and on what terms.

The narrower the gate, the greater the power. When there are many routes, a gatekeeper’s choices matter little. When almost everything must pass through one or two, their rankings, rules and fees shape whole industries.

Where it comes from

The social psychologist Kurt Lewin coined the idea of gatekeeping in a study of how wartime food habits could be changed. He noticed that food moved to the table through channels with decision points, and that the person controlling each point, often the housewife who shopped, determined what the family ate. In 1950 the communication researcher David Manning White applied the idea to news, studying a newspaper wire editor he called “Mr. Gates” and showing how personal judgements decided which stories reached readers.

In 2000 the philosophers Lucas Introna and Helen Nissenbaum argued that search engines had become the gatekeepers of the web, and that their technical and commercial choices systematically favoured some sites over others. The legal scholar Tim Wu traced in The Master Switch how each information industry, from telephone to film to radio, tended towards a single controlled gate.

What it does to the mind

Gatekeeping is powerful partly because it is invisible. People who see only what passed through the gate rarely think about what was filtered out, and treat the selection as the world. Those who depend on the gate, such as publishers and developers, internalise its rules and anticipate its preferences, so the gatekeeper shapes their work without issuing orders. Over time, the gate’s criteria become the standards of the field.

Where it shows up

The essay on web search describes a search engine becoming the gate to the web, and courts finding that it used that position to protect itself. The essay on app stores describes two companies deciding which software reaches billions of phones. The essay on marketplaces describes platforms that rank, govern and compete with their merchants, and the essay on recommendation feeds describes algorithms choosing what billions of people see.

What it asks of someone deciding

Map your gates. Know which channels you depend on to reach customers, suppliers and talent, and how much of your business passes through each.

Build routes the gatekeeper does not control: direct relationships, owned channels, a brand people seek out by name.

If you hold a gate, govern it as if you might have to justify every rule in public, because increasingly you will.

Argue with it

The strongest objection

Every channel needs someone to choose what passes. Editors, curators and platform rules protect people from noise, fraud and harm; without gatekeepers there is not freedom but chaos.

Take it to your team

Questions to ask

  • Which single channel could cut us off from most of our customers?
  • What would our product look like if we designed it for the gatekeeper’s rules rather than the customer’s needs, and are we already doing so?
  • Where are we a gatekeeper for others, and are our rules ones we would accept from the other side?

Follow the thread

Connections

Read further

Bibliography

  1. Kurt Lewin, “Frontiers in Group Dynamics II,” Human Relations 1, no. 2 (1947), 143–153.
  2. David Manning White, “The ‘Gate Keeper’: A Case Study in the Selection of News,” Journalism Quarterly 27 (1950), 383–390.
  3. Lucas D. Introna and Helen Nissenbaum, “Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters,” The Information Society 16, no. 3 (2000), 169–185.
  4. Tim Wu, The Master Switch (Knopf, 2010).

How to cite

Shrikant Kumar. “Whoever Controls the Gate.” Idea, Telos. https://shrikantk.com/ideas/gatekeepers/

↑ ↓ to move↵ to open⌘K to toggle